Thursday, October 15, 2015

7.5 Project 2 Outline.

  1. Introduction
    1. Thesis
      1.  Mansuripur's research in physical optics has lead to resolving the issue of "hidden" momentum by utilizing the Einstein-Laub force formula, which he suggests using over the classical Lorentz force formula, due to his observations of incompatibility with Special Relativity and Momentum of Conservation experiments.
  2. The body paragraphs
    1. Cultural Analysis
      1. Special Relativity
      2. Classical Dynamics
      3. Lorentz Force
      4. Einstein-Laub Force
    2. Audience Analysis
      1. Theoretical Physicists
      2. Experiments modeling charged particles in magnetic fields moving at relativistic speeds.
      3. Has the attitude that physicist should consider abandoning the classical view for this new model predicted by the Einstein-Laub formula.
    3. Assumptions Analysis
      1. My beliefs
      2. Scientific community beliefs
      3. Do not differ in culture or historical time period
      4. Common belief that scientific finding should be tested to gain acceptance.
    4. Message Analysis
      1. Proof that a model predicted by the Einstein-Laub formula is better suited for specific experiment parameters.
      2. Does not have a strong emotional message
      3. Maintains clarity in message
    5. Rhetorical Strategies Analysis
      1. Appeal to Credibility
        1. references
        2. mathematical proofs
        3. experimental proof
      2. Appeal to Emotion
        1. very little emotions in argument
      3. Appeal to Logic
        1. Very logical strategy to gain the acceptance in his perspective
        2. Actual result is a retaliation by those who support the classical physics view on the matter
  3. The conclusion

1 comment:

  1. I like how well planned out and detailed your outline is. It's obvious that you have put a lot of time into your research and figuring out how format your paper. I also think it's really interesting that you are going to discuss your beliefs along with those of the scientific community.

    ReplyDelete